What is the difference between MTS and MTO?

Discover the differences between Make to Stock (MTS) and Make to Order (MTO) manufacturing strategies. Optimize working capital and lead times.
Latest Updates & Insights
Trusted by Operational Excellence Professionals
Project Manager, OSF Digital
"A Supply Chain Management Guru. The technical assessments developed with real-life scenarios are top-tier. I learned a lot through this framework."
CEO, Paadio Consulting
"A great place to learn and grow. The methodology provides exceptional service through deep knowledge and strategic empathy."
Founder & Editor-in-Chief, Technics Publications
"High-quality educational frameworks and products. An excellent educator and expert in Supply Chain Management."
Operations Professional, Manufacturing Sector
"Highly informative for understanding concepts from end to end. It provides great illustration of what supply chain and logistics is all about."
Logistics Expansion Director, International Trade & Retail.
"Very informative and provided the necessary tools to develop advanced skills and drive career improvement in operational excellence."
Lean Inventory Management

What is the Difference Between MTS and MTO?

Inventory planning and decoupling point placement are critical for multi-product and multi-stage manufacturing operations. Choosing between Make to Stock (MTS) and Make to Order (MTO) dictates your working capital requirements, lead times, and operational flexibility.

Make to Stock (MTS) vs. Make to Order (MTO): Comparison

  • Primary Trigger: MTS uses Demand Forecast (Push System) | MTO uses Firm Customer Order (Pull System)

  • Lead Time: MTS is Very Short (Off-the-shelf) | MTO is Longer (Production + Delivery)

  • Inventory Risk: MTS is High (Risk of obsolescence/holding costs) | MTO is Low (Raw material & WIP focus)

  • Product Customization: MTS is Low (Standardized SKUs) | MTO is High (Tailored/Configured SKUs)

  • Ideal For: MTS suits High-velocity FMCG & Commodity goods | MTO suits Custom machinery & Project-based B2B

1. Make to Stock (MTS): Demand-Driven Buffer

The Make to Stock approach relies on accurate demand forecasting. Production runs ahead of demand to ensure finished goods are available across distribution networks.

  • Best For: Fast-moving Stock-Keeping Units (SKUs) and commodity goods (e.g., FMCG, packaging stock).

  • Key Advantage: Maximizes service levels by eliminating production lead time for the end buyer.

  • Main Risk: Trapped working capital and excess inventory carrying costs if forecasts fail.

2. Make to Order (MTO): Pull-Based Precision

The Make to Order strategy activates production only when a confirmed customer order is received.

  • Best For: High-mix/low-volume products, industrial equipment, and specialized B2B manufacturing.

  • Key Advantage: Minimizes finished goods inventory and eliminates stock obsolescence risks.

  • Main Risk: Requires strict shop-floor scheduling and optimized setup times to meet expected lead times.

The Hybrid Approach: Finding the Decoupling Point

Modern supply chains rarely rely 100% on pure MTS or pure MTO. Instead, top-performing plants utilize a Hybrid (Assemble to Order / ATO) framework, strategically placing the order decoupling point at the sub-assembly or raw material level.

To optimize your decoupling point, coordinate three core operational roles:

  • Inventory Planner: Classifies SKUs by cash velocity using ABC/XYZ analysis.

  • Production Planner: Balances line capacity between MTS buffers and MTO rush orders.

  • Fulfillment Planner: Aligns logistics scheduling with customer Service Level Agreements (SLAs).

Optimize Your Inventory & Production Flow

Unsure whether your plant is carrying too much inventory buffer or suffering from customer lead time delays?

Deploy our interactive Manufacturing Opportunity Scan to evaluate your inventory days, capacity constraints, and operational cash flow in under 5 minutes:


Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our community of like-minded Operational Excellence enthusiasts and subscribe to our newsletter for the latest trends, expert insights, and exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox.

Share this insight

Recent Posts
Ieva Kalve

Ieva Kalve

Associate Consultant

I believe that it is healthy laziness that moves the world and business forward, and I am always ready to help find the most effective and appropriate solutions concerning strategic and change management, as well as various efficiency solutions in office work.

As a practicing consultant in Latvia, I already have 20 years of experience in various fields related to the optimization of organizational management:

  • I can help with advice on implementing the Balanced Scorecard system,
  • I have experience in creating IT and document management system modernization strategies,
  • I am a certified European ergonomist, and therefore we can work together on modern office solutions that both increase work efficiency and create comfortable and health-friendly workplaces.

 

I am constantly updating my knowledge both informally – following everything new in my areas of competence, and also formally: I have master’s degrees in pedagogy, economics, nutrition science, and modeling of sociotechnical systems. In 2021, I was a full-time student again for 1 semester – at the University of Buffalo (USA).

It is this unique “set” that allows me to view various processes, trends, and organizational needs holistically, offering realistic and at the same time modern solutions.

I also share my experience with students of various Latvian universities, I have given lectures in Lithuania, Germany, and Moldova as part of the Erasmus+ program, as well as participated in the international Sail program.

I also like to conduct corporate training.

Antoine

Antoine Hauger

ASSOCIATE CONSULTANT

Antoine is a marketing enthusiast with a deeper understanding of digital marketing.  

Having worked for SMEs and international groups, Antoine has gained deeper online marketing (B2B & B2C) experience in various industries like retail, automotive and software.

Being a Partner and Marketing Manager at a global software vendor in the open source segment enabled Antoine, on the one hand, to consult digital agencies to build up and extend relationships, increasing their client base and improving customer experience. And on the other hand, to build up his global marketing competencies (E-Mail/Social Media/Content/Event).

In his new role as Partner Marketing Manager, Antoine is responsible for the strategic & operative rollout of the partner marketing program to its worldwide partner network of 150+ members.